Dr. Martin Pall: 5G Criminally Insane Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) Fry Living Things
Dr. Martin Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University. I am a published and widely cited scientist on the biological effects of electromagnetic fields and speak internationally on this topic. I am particularly expert in how wireless radiation impacts the electrical systems in our bodies.
I have published 7 studies showing there exists exquisite sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in the voltage sensor in each cell, such that the force impacting our cells at the voltage sensor has a massive impact on the biology on the cells of our bodies.
5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them. Written and Compiled by Martin L. Pall, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State UniversityAddress: 638 NE 41st Ave., Portland OR 97232 USA, firstname.lastname@example.org 503-232-3883 May 17, 2018
From: Pall, Martin L <email@example.com>
Sent: Sun, Mar 1, 2020 11:11 pm
Subject: EMF summary document with 9 attachments
Martin L. Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University — February 18, 2020
Let me first introduce myself.
I recently returned from two different long speaking trips. Over the past three months, I have given 10 different invited professional talks as well as a larger number of other talks. The 10 invited professional talks in 6 countries on 3 continents included three prestigious Keynote Addresses. All ten of these were on the voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) mechanism as the main mechanism of action of low intensity EMFs. 9 of the 10 also discussed the dangers of 5G
They also included a talk at Queens University, one of the top universities in Canada, with that talk having been sponsored by the Department of Engineering and Applied Science. Another particularly important talk was presented at the World Congress on Physics in Berlin, a talk that was given a prestigious Certificate of Recognition. These two talks show that both engineering and physics are starting to recognize the extraordinary challenge we are facing from low intensity EMFs acting via VGCC activation to produce widespread massive biological impacts.
In addition to the 10 invited, professional talks I also gave invited talks at the EU Parliament in Brussels and at the Finnish Parliament in Helsinki and many other non-professional talks to groups of lay people. I have, at this writing, given a total of 59 invited professional talks on these topics in 15 countries on four continents, so the recognition of the VGCC mechanism is very widespread.
This is further documented because the first paper I published on this mechanism, published in 2013, has now been cited 251 times, according to the Google Scholar database. I have, in addition, eight other papers on the VGCC mechanism, with six of these well on their way to having far above average citation levels. As you may know, science is usually very slow in adopting new scientific paradigms, so the adoption of this one is very surprisingly rapid.
I’m going to discuss several attachments starting with the first two attachments. The first attachment, is centered on the testing of eight different predictions of the ICNIRP “safety guidelines.” In each of these 8 highly repeated studies, the “safety guidelines” fail and fail massively to predict biological effects. Three of these predictions are focused on the fact that pulsed EMFs are much more biologically active than are non-pulsed EMFs of the same average intensities.
These show that the “safety guidelines” which are based on average intensities averaged over a 6 minute period, cannot be used to predict biological effects and therefore cannot be used to predict safety.
Pulsation is particularly important in understanding 5G effects because 5G is designed to carry vast amounts of information per second, with the information being carried by the unprecedented level of modulated pulsation in 5G radiation.
The second attachment is a description of the apparent 5G effects that we are seeing, mostly from Europe. I have summarized the second attachment as follows:
In summary, we have a series of 5G linked events that have occurred in more than one situation, where we have plausible mechanisms by which 5G radiation can cause them and where we know that counter arguments are based on “safety guidelines” which fail to predict biological effects and are, therefore, fraudulent. These include:
1. Neurological/neuropsychiatric effects reported both in Switzerland and in Stuttgart Germany following 5G “rollout”, effects similar to but more severe than effects caused by other EMF exposures.
2. Three suicides within 11 days of each other in the first 5G ambulance personnel.
3. Cardiac effects also reported in both in Switzerland and in Stuttgart Germany, effects similar to those found in in humans in following other EMF exposures as well as in animal experimental studies.
4. Two cases of massive, almost instantaneous 5G bird sudden cardiac death effects, one in the Netherlands and one in the UK.
5. We have cases of mass panic in cattle, as well as other neurological/neuropsychiatric effects in cattle and sheep.
6. We have multiple cases of human limb birth defects in France and Germany.
7. We have multiple cases of apparent 5G fires in Korea and in Southern California.
8. We have large apparent increases in EHS in Stuttgart Germany. While this is a single example, to my knowledge, similar although more slowly developing examples of EHS have been shown to occur in occupational EMF exposure studies and in the two smart meter studies. The case may be weaker here than for the other seven, because it is based solely on the Stuttgart example, but is still substantial.
9. Wuhan China is China’s first 5G smart city and also the location of China’s first 5G highway. It is also the epicenter of the horrendous coronavirus epidemic. During 2019, approximately 10,000 5G antennae were put up and turned on in Wuhan, with approximately 8000 of these put up in the last 2 ½ month of 2019. That 2 1/2 month period was also the approximate time period during which the coronavirus epidemic including the death rate became much worse.
All of this might be coincidental and it might seem unlikely that 5G radiation might be greatly exacerbating the coronavirus epidemic. But consider the following: Five downstream effects produced following EMF exposures have important roles in causing coronavirus infections, including the release of new virions so that they can infect other cells and other people, excessive intracellular calcium, oxidative stress, NF-kappaB elevation, inflammation and apoptosis.
The predominant cause of death of the coronavirus epidemic is pneumonia and pneumonia is also exacerbated by these same five downstream effects following EMF exposure. Therefore, what may have appeared to be very unlikely, is actually very plausible based on known mechanisms.
In each of these cases, as stated above, we have plausible mechanisms by which each of them can be produced by 5G EMF exposure and where all contrary claims that there cannot be any effects, based on “safety guidelines” are simply fraudulent. In the first seven of these effects and the 9th, we have a prima facie case for 5G causation of each of them.
And let me repeat that any effects seen with the initial “rollout” of 5G radiation will be a tiny fraction of those predicted by a mature 5G system interacting with the “internet of things” because any initial 5G system has very little to communicate with on initial rollout and therefore will produce only a tiny fraction of highly pulsed EMF effects of such a mature system.
The very high impacts of modulating and non-modulating pulses mean that the extraordinarily high level of modulating pulses in 5G radiation, with those pulses communicating vast amounts of information per second, means that 5G radiation is vastly more dangerous than the exposures we previously have had and those previous exposures have already having massive impacts on us and on other organisms.
The nine apparent 5G effects listed above do not include other predicted massive effects of 5G radiation where we know they produced by other EMFs but have no evidence of whether they are occurring or not from 5G. Predicted effects include:
1. Massive impacts on male reproduction, where 5G radiation may well produce very rapid crashes in male reproduction to close to zero.
2. Universal of near universal very early onset Alzheimer’s dementia (AD). Here we know that all you have to do to produce universal or near universal very early onset AD in a rat model, is to give a series of EMF pulses during one day and even during one second. If you give pulses every day, you get universal or near universal AD in six month old rats (roughly the equivalent age of a 12 year old child).
3. Universal or near universal autism. We know, from genetic studies, that human autism is caused by excessive VGCC activity and because this is the primary mechanism of action of EMFs, including MM-wave EMFs of 5G, it is highly plausible that the very highly pulsed 5G may cause universal or near universal autism.
4. Very high levels of germ line mutations caused by the impact of 5G radiation acting via VGCC activation on the DNA of human sperm and on the DNA of human oocytes. What this argues is that what little human reproduction survives the effects of #1 may well be heavily impacted by very high levels of de novo mutation.
Possible causation of each of these by 5G radiation could have been tested by animal model studies, before any 5G rollout. It is my opinion that it is an atrocity of almost unbelievable proportions that no such tests have been done on this or the other apparent effects where we do have data.
Environmental effects of 5G radiation are demonstrated in each of the first two attachments. However, I am providing you with much more evidence of this. The third attachment is a study of a highly protected area of Australia centered on Mt. Nardi, an area where despite such protections, enhanced 3G and later 4G antennae were allowed to be put in place and activated based on the fraudulent claims of the “safety guidelines” discussed above and in the first two attachments.
What you can see analyzed in detail in the third attachments, there were very large effects of the enhanced 3G antennae on insects, birds, mammals and amphibia. The 4G antennae produced massive effects on each of these four groups of animals. Now the 5G system is designed to work with 4G as essential part of the system such that with the very high level of 4G/5G antenna densification, the 4G part alone will produce massive effects.
It is essential, therefore, that any environmental impact statement of 5G “rollout” include massive expected effects on insects, birds, mammals and amphibia. The insect impacts will be particularly massive because there were two US patents issued for using non-pulsed millimeter wave EMFs as insecticides (patent #s 6,073,365 and 6,192,598).
It follows that extremely highly pulsed millimeter wave 5G radiation will produce even more massive impacts on insect populations. The fourth attachment also reviews further evidence on impacts of EMFs on various types of animals.
EMFs produce also produce large impacts on plants as shown in the fourth attachment, analyzing EMF effects on trees. The fifth attachment shows that trees are impacted by cell phone tower radiation, which produced cumulative damage on trees but where parts of trees that are partially shielded from such radiation by buildings are partially protected from such effects.
I have published on how EMFs impact plants and as is the case in animals EMFs activate ion channels which then produce excessive intracellular calcium levels (sixth attachment). It follows. from this, that excessive calcium signaling in plants produces much of the EMF effects in plants, allowing us to predict what types of effects may be expected in plants.
One of the effects produced is that EMFs, acting via increased intracellular calcium, cause plants to produce very high amounts highly volatile and highly flammable terpenes which causes the plants to become highly flammable. This predicts, in turn, possible 5G fires and as shown in the first attachment there are several severe fires which may well have been caused by 5G radiation.
It follows from this that in any environmental impact statement of 5G radiation, the possible (probable?) occurrence of severe 5G fires must be mentioned.
Everything in our human world is a dependent upon our collective brain function. Consequently the neurological/neuropsychiatric effects of EMFs which were discussed in my second-most cited EMF paper (see seventh attachment) raise major concerns about the especially dangerous 5G radiation. Burnout, which is also produced by EMF exposure raises other, additional concern (see 8th attachment). Obviously very, very, very early onset Alzheimer’s dementias raise almost unimaginable issues.
There are a five other things that I would like to discuss very briefly.
1. 42 different statements.
2. FCC as a captured agency.
3. Liability Insurance
4. Personality assassination.
5. Wired communication.
42 Different Statements Written by Highly Qualified Scientists and/or Physicians
The ninth attachment is a list of statements written by highly qualified scientists and/or physicians, with each expressing high level concern that the safety guidelines do not take into consideration non-thermal effects and only protect us from thermal effects. These were all written between 2002 and the present and several are focused on 5G. Clearly there is a consensus among independent scientists that there are non-thermal effects occurring, thus contradicting the industry propaganda position.
The FCC Is a Captured Agency
A document, published by the Harvard Safra Institute for Ethics, shows that the FCC is a “captured agency” captured by the telecom industry it is supposed to be regulating. Title: “Captured Agency: How the Federal Communications Commission Is Dominated by the Industries It Presumably Regulates,” by Norman Alster.
I believe this is a document that everyone interested in this area should read.
Liability Insurance or Lack Thereof
Liability insurance coverage regarding EMF effects: Swiss Re, the second largest re-insurer in the world, wrote a document in 1997 putting the risks of EMF effects in the highest risk category. They wrote another such document, again with the highest risk category in 2003. Then again, in 2016, they made a similar assessment of risk for EMFs.
Lloyds of London and then most, if not all other insurance companies have put EMF exclusion statements in their standard liability policies. The insurance company positions have been discussed in: Roseanne White Geisel June 03, 2007, Insurers exclude risks associated with electromagnetic radiation. https://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20070603/ISSUE03/100022051/insurers-exclude-risks-associated-with-electromagnetic-radiation
The Environmental Health Trust has a long, useful discussion on this: https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/reports-white-papers-insurance-industry/
So here we have the insurance industry whose business model is focused on accurate assessment of risk, coming to the conclusion that there are very high potential risks caused by EMF exposure when the telecom industry propaganda argues that there are no risks. Given that we know that the telecom industry has a gigantic conflict of interest, we should be very careful before rejecting the insurance industry’s assessment.
There have been at least 14 scientists who have been victims of personality assassination by the telecom industry, where an incredibly wealthy and powerful industry attacks individual scientists through their surrogates. This started in Nov. 1994 before Dr. Lai had even published his first paper on EMF DNA effects and was immediately followed by the infamous “War Gaming Memo.”
Since, then the following US scientists have been the victims of personality assassination attacks: Allan Frey, William Rea, David Carpenter, Om Gandhi, Cindy Sage; in Europe similar attacks have been done on Lennart Hardell, Franz Adlkofer, Hugo Rüdinger, Dominique Belpomme, Olle Johansson and Dimitris Panagopoulos. I suspect that others should be included here, in addition.
Each of these people has had a distinguished scientific career and the only reason each has been attacked is because each has had important scientific findings that the telecom industry did not like. Since this started over 25 years ago, there has been unrelenting personality assassination on prominent scientists.
It is not pleasant to be the target of such attacks but I take it as a badge of honor that I have been added to this list. The telecom industry obviously thinks it is to their advantage to perform personality assassinations, but anyone should see that this history confirms that they have no science. If they had science, they would be debating the science, not attacking individuals.
Wired communication, both fiber optic and copper wire, is always preferable to wireless — it is faster, more reliable, has much better security and is much more energy efficient and, most importantly, wired communications have minimal biological impact. We already know that 5G is a nightmare and must be stopped, completely apart from the many severe predicted effects where we have no data. We can benefit from most of these technologies using wired connections, so there is no need for 5G, or for that matter 4G or Wi-Fi.
Martin L. Pall
Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences
Washington State University
working from my home in Portland, OR (503-232-3883)
We know that there is a massive literature, providing a high level of scientific certainty, for each of eight pathophysiological effects caused by non-thermal microwave frequency EMF exposures. This is shown in from 12 to 35 reviews on each specific effect, with each review listed in Chapter 1, providing a substantial body of evidence on the existence of each effect. Such EMFs:
1. Attack our nervous systems including our brains leading to widespread
neurological/neuropsychiatric effects and possibly many other effects. This nervous system attack is of great concern.
2. Attack our endocrine (that is hormonal) systems. In this context, the main things that make us functionally different from single-celled creatures are our nervous system and our endocrine systems – even a simple planaria worm needs both of these. Thus the consequences of the disruption of these two regulatory systems are immense, such that it is a travesty to ignore these findings.
3. Produce oxidative stress and free radical damage, which have central roles in essentially all chronic diseases.
4. Attack the DNA of our cells, producing single-strand and double-strand breaks in cellular DNA and oxidized bases in our cellular DNA. These, in turn, produce cancer and also mutations in germline cells which produce mutations in future generations.
5. Produce elevated levels of apoptosis (programmed cell death), events especially important in causing both neurodegenerative diseases and infertility.
6. Lower male and female fertility, lower sex hormones, lower libido and increased levels of spontaneous abortion and, as already stated, attack the DNA in sperm cells.
7. Produce excessive intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i and excessive calcium signaling.
8. Attack the cells of our bodies to cause cancer. Such attacks are thought to act via 15 different mechanisms during cancer causation.
There is also a substantial literature showing that EMFs also cause other effects including life-threatening cardiac effects (Chapter 3). In addition, substantial evidence suggests EMF causation of very early-onset dementia, including Alzheimer’s, digital and other types of dementias (Chapter 3); and there is evidence that EMF exposures in utero and shortly after birth can cause ADHD and autism (Chapter 5).
Each of these effects is produced via the main mechanism of action of microwave/lower frequency EMFs, activation of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) (Chapter 2). Each of them is produced via what are called downstream effects of VGCC activation. It follows from this that we have a good understanding not only that these effects occur, but also how they can occur.
The extraordinary sensitivity of the VGCC voltage sensor to the forces of the EMFs tells us that the current safety guidelines allow us to be exposed to EMF levels that are something like 7.2 million times too high. That sensitivity is predicted by the physics. Therefore, the physics and the biology are each pointing to the same mechanism of action of non-thermal EMFs.
The different effects produced are obviously very deep concerns. They become much deeper and become existential threats when one considers that several of these effects are both cumulative and eventually irreversible.
There is substantial evidence for the cumulative nature and eventual irreversibility of the neurological/neuropsychiatric effects, of the reproductive effects, the mutational DNA effects, the cardiac effects, of some but not other of the hormonal effects (Chapter 3); any causation of ADHD and autism may add additional concerns (here the cumulative nature is probably limited to the perinatal period).
When we know that sperm counts have dropped by more than 50% throughout the technologically advanced countries on earth, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that the vast majority of the population in those countries is already substantially impacted. The same conclusion can be made based on the widespread nature of the neuropsychiatric effects in those countries.
Both of those effects will get much much worse even with no increase in current exposures, due to the cumulative nature and irreversibility of these effects. I expect we will see crash in human reproduction almost to zero as happened in the Magras and Xenos mouse study which I estimate to occur within about 5 years, without any increases in our exposures.
Obviously 4G and 5G will make the situation much worse. Similarly, I expect that the deterioration in brain function that we are already seeing will seal our fate if we fail to act rapidly and vigorously. Our collective brain function may become completely incapable of dealing with such a mega-crisis situation.
Now it can be argued that some of these may not develop as I expect, although those expectations are based on the best available evidence. One may even be able to argue this for all of those expectations. However, when we have substantial risk of multiple existential threats to every single technologically advanced country on earth, failure to act vigorously means there is a very high probability of complete destruction of these societies.
And the chaos which would inevitably ensue, in a world that still has nuclear weapons, may well lead to extinction. In the face of these types or risk, the only reasonable course is to move with great vigor to stop new exposures and lower current exposures. One can still access the internet, using wired connections. And we can lower cell phone tower and cell phone radiation substantially. Smart meters, if needed, can work via wired connections.
Over 60% of this document (Chapters 5 & 6), is focused on the failures of statements from SCENIHR, the telecommunications industry, the U.S. FCC and the U.S. FDA to reflect the science. Their statements repeatedly omit much, often all of the most important science. Their statements are rife not only with omissions, but also with easily demonstrable falsehoods and with false logic.
These have often occurred at times where we know that they knew better. These have occurred along with vigorous efforts by the telecommunications industry to corrupt the science by attacking individual scientists whose only fault is that they have obtained important findings that the industry does not like. These attacks have occurred along with vigorous efforts to corrupt two agencies that have important regulatory roles.
There are also possible concerns about individual industry-linked research studies. All wireless communication devices put out polarized EMFs that carry information via pulsations. Both the pulsations and the polarization make these EMFs much more biologically active.
There are three other factors that also influence the production of effects. Several industry-linked studies may have used these factors, along with using very tiny numbers of individual animals in their studies, to produce studies which may have been designed to fail (Chapter 5). It is not clear at this point whether this type of concern is quite limited or whether it is very broad.
The European Commission has done nothing to protect European citizens from any of these very serious health hazards and the U.S. FDA, EPA, and National Cancer Institute have done nothing to protect American citizens. The U.S. FCC has been much worse than that, acting vigorously with wanton disregard for our health.
Source: The Sun
‘Covid-19″ patients have described a bizarre new symptom – a ‘fizzing’ sensation under the skin.
One woman from North Tyneside said she felt like she had been “dunked in an ice lake” after feeling the strange tingling feeling.
Coronavirus has claimed 8,958 lives in the United Kingdom with more than 70,000 cases.
Tracy Clark, 49, from North Tyneside, said she also felt a fizzing sensation while experiencing symptoms of the covid-19..
She said: “I describe it differently in three ways: like being dunked in an icy lake, like being struck by lightning, like pins and needles all over my body. No pain though, just terrifying.”
Liam Gardner, 40, from Surrey told the Sun Online said after four weeks of experiencing coronavirus symptoms he recently started feeling a “tingling pains” in his hands and arms.
He said: “My index finger and ring finger have gone completely numb and I feel this tingling sensation all over my hands and arms.
“On Thursday I had a video call with a private doctor and they had no idea what could be affecting my nervous system.”
Liam has yet to be tested for Covid-19 but paramedics have visited him at home twice, when he experienced a stabbing pain in his chest and ran a high temperature.’
Could these fizzing/heating sensations be linked to 5G ?
In a previous post we have issued the possibility that “covid19” and the symptoms associated with it might not come from an actual virus but from 5G Frequencies.
We know that the rollout of 5G is geting faster and faster with many people around the world reporting seing 5G towers/boxes being installed outside their homes while the whole world is on house arrest.
in this previous post we shared a video of a NYC-ICU Doctor sharing is experience working with covid-19 patients, he said that the symtoms he’s seen on these people are not what they have been told they would be.
He said that what he was seing didn’t look like a viral form of neumonia , his patients were slowly dying because they lungs were being deprived of oxygen.
He explained that these symtoms don’t look like it’s caused by a virus, “it’s what you’d expect to see if you dropped a regular person at the top of mount everest , that person would slowly die by lack of oxygen.
As a result of this video many people have been claiming that these symtoms are likely caused by 5G at 60ghz.
5G unlike 4G operates on another spectrum bands in higher frequency ranges above 6 GHz to 100 GHz and beyond, utilizing submillimeter and millimeter waves
this means telecom compagnies with be able to adjust 5G towers/boxes of these frequencies within the 5G frequency spectrum .
The graphic shows that 60ghz frequency is absorbed by 98% of oxygen.
Oxygen the atom is O, the moledcule is o2, these two atoms creating oxygen molecules are sharing some electrons, 60ghz causes the electrons surrounding oxygen molecules to spin.
Changes to the spin frequency of oxygen electrons have a direct impact on it’s aborption by the lungs.
Oxygen is normaly absorbed through your lungs by a protein in your red blood cells called hemoglobin, under the effect of 60ghz the hemoglobin is unable to bind wih the oxygen molecules.
This results in oxygen depravation, your blood can’t provide oxygen to the rest of your body, and you die of asphyxiation.
This is what 5G at 60ghz does to your body, but this is the effects of just one frequency on the 5G spectrum..what could the effect be when 5G is set at 70ghz…80ghz ?
Among the many potential problems with exposure to 5G radio waves are issues with the skin, which is interesting when you consider that this technology is already being used in the military for crowd control purposes.
“This kind of technology, which is in many of our homes, actually interacts with human skin and eyes. The shocking finding was made public via Israeli research studies that were presented at an international conference on the subject last year.
“Below you can find a lecture from Dr. Ben-Ishai of the Department of Physics at Hebrew University. He goes through how human sweat ducts act like a number of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths that are put out by the devices that employ 5G technology.” [Source]
The U.S. military developed a non-lethal crowd control weapon system called the Active Denial System (ADS). It uses radio frequency millimeter waves in the 95GHz range to penetrate the top 1/64 of an inch layer of skin on the targeted individual, instantly producing an intolerable heating sensation that causes them to flee.
Quote: Tracy Clark, 49, from North Tyneside, said she also felt a fizzing sensation while experiencing symptoms of the covid-19..
She said: “I describe it differently in three ways: like being dunked in an icy lake, like being struck by lightning, like pins and needles all over my body. No pain though, just terrifying.”
I don’t know about you but to me these symtoms sounds pretty similar to the ones inflicted by 95ghz millimiter waves, if 95ghz can cause heating sensation to the point of making the enemy run away, what could be the effect of this technology being used just one step lower..let’s say 80ghz ?
Maybe it will cause a less pronounced heating..fizzing sensation on on the skin, but enough to make people want to see a doctor.
If any of you has any information on studies or personnal experiences with the effects of any other frequencies withing the 5G spectrum, please contact us.
1889 Flu Epidemic
Connect the flu epidemic of 1889 with electrical innovation. At this time it was the rapid expansion of the electrified railroad in the US. Until 1888, there were only 45 miles of electrified railroad in the US. Yet, in a single year, this network grew to over 1000 miles.
Very low-frequency waves can travel thousands of miles, bouncing off the ionosphere and virtually traveling around the world at the speed of light.
That same year a vicious flu erupted virtually simultaneously in such far-flung places as Greenland, Uzbekistan, and Northern Alberta. It then quickly appeared in even more disparate locations, such as Philadelphia, Australia, and the Balkans. In the days of pre-air travel, it seemed impossible that a contagious disease could travel this fast to so many seemingly-unrelated geographies.
By the end of 1889, the death toll had reached over one million worldwide. Even more, telling is that until then, influenza outbreaks had been a relatively rare occurrence. It had been nearly 30 years since the previous influenza outbreak in England. Firstenberg suggests that 1889 marked the beginning of influenza being an annual phenomenon for humans.
Spanish Flu 1918
The most notable connection is the famous Spanish Flu Epidemic of 1918, which killed more than 20 million people worldwide. This epidemic actually started on military bases in the US at about the same time the US military was rolling out a new form of wireless communications.
Between 1917 and 1918, the US military built the world’s largest radio network. Meanwhile, the flu accelerated across military bases both stateside and overseas, and on ships equipped with powerful wireless transmitters. As the troops and wireless equipment arrived in the European theatre during WWI, a sudden explosion of disease raced unabetted across Europe.
Missile Defense Systems and the Asian Flu of 1958
We now flash forward to 1958. In the heart of the Cold War, the US had just completed the build-out of the most powerful and extensive missile defense system the world had ever seen. Hundreds of high power radar stations that generated 1350 megahertz signals and included Doppler stations, operating at more than one kilowatt, were suddenly filling the heavens with unnatural levels of microwave radiation.
The problem is that all these microwave signals bounce off the ionosphere and then come back to earth. The earth’s electrical envelope acts like a resonating chamber that traps all this electrical activity and propels it at light speed to all corners of the planet.
During the build-out of the US triple-threat missile defense system, the Asian Flu was born in China. The death toll ultimately reached 4 million worldwide. Scientists associated this flu with the H2N2 virus, which was thought to be avian-related.
So, which is it? Is the flu caused by long-dormant viruses, which are suddenly triggered by electrical disruptions in the atmosphere? Or, as it is generally believed, is the flu transmitted by viruses mainly found in birds, or poultry that somehow find their way into the human population?
Actually, both theories may be correct.
Immune System weakened from Wireless Radiation
In 2013, a Washington State University professor, Dr. Martin Pall published a landmark paper, “Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects.” This paper shows how electrical changes to ion channels can lead to biological chaos in the body, including the proliferation of free-radicals and excess calcium ions.
Excess calcium ions (electrically charged elements) can be toxic. Typical symptoms include nausea, fatigue, muscle pain, and fuzzy thinking. Sound a little like the flu? Meanwhile, the proliferation of free-radicals creates inflammation, neurological impacts, and a compromised immune system.
If both Pall and Firstenberg are right, the rapid spread of the flu is much more than just the exposure to the underlying virus. While the virus is real, it may be both triggered and accelerated by changes in the electrical environment. Such changes undermine our immune response to these viruses and we are unable to fight them off.
The 5G Connection
This brings us to 5G. For those who are unfamiliar with 5G, it is the fifth generation of wireless and cellular technologies. It uniquely uses intense clusters of wireless transmitters, which produce extremely high-frequency signals and raise radiation exposure to humans exponentially.
The frequency levels of this new technology can be many, many times higher than current wireless standards. Noted physicist Maxwell Planck showed that the level of energy in an electrical source is proportional to its frequency. Thus, 5G stands to impose significantly higher biological effects on humans than any previous technology.
Now, is it any coincidence that Wuhan, China, a leading “Smart City”, and one of the earliest adopters of 5G transmitters, is the very source of Covid-19 – the Coronavirus?
Well, if you are still doubting the connection between 5G and the Coronavirus, check out this overlay map* which locates major 5G installations in China and the major outbreaks of the Coronavirus there.
Maybe Firstenberg’s claim ( The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life) of a connection between influenza and wireless technology is not so far-fetched after all.